Satanic symbols The film is not a rerun of Idioterne, then

Satanic symbols

The film is not a rerun of Idioterne, then. Dancer in the Dark IS a brilliant the comments above about Bjorks lack of talent are way off the mark. She writes beautiful music and turns in a staggering performance in Dancer. Careful, or Ill ban Welcome to the forum harmolodic ! Professor of archeology, expert on the occult, and how does one say it? Obtainer of rare antiquities. My GF went to see Dancer in the Dark and she kinda liked it, but she had to leave about 1/3 into the movie because she got sea-sick from the shaky camera. Im not joking here. Mahavishnu likes it and I hate Björks music, so I wouldnt touch this movie with a ten foot pole anyway. Stick with Anaconda, Analyse This, The Bone Collector, Cutthroat Island, Entrapment, Jumanji, Leathal Weapon 4, What Lies Beneath and all those othe Putting a after taking a shot at Doms taste in movies doesnt make it ok. Anyone whos been here as long as Dom is surely aware of your tastes when it comes to cinema. Which is why he could say If maha likes it, then I sure as hell wont. He wasnt taking a shot at your tastes, just stating that his satanic symbols diametrically opposite. So once again you prove to all of us what an arrogant ass you are, by checking doms profiler list for targets of an thinly veiled personal attack on his tastes. He doesnt know the kind of movies that i like because he hasnt seen any of them!!! If Mahavishnu likes it so I wouldnt touch this movie with a ten foot pole anyway. isnt a personal attack then I dont know what is. This message has been edited by mahavishnu edited 07-16-200 He doesnt know the kind of movies that i like because he hasnt seen any of them!!! Just because he doesnt have any of the movies you like in his collection, does not mean that he hasnt seen them. No double standard here. I still maintain that Doms comment was not a personal attack, merely a statement that he knows full well the difference between his and your taste in movies. Oh thats right. Im sure Dom has seen all the movies I like. Actually, I doubt hes seen even 5% of them. Its thus patronising of him to assume he understands my taste. What satanic symbols really saying is that Dom can criticise the movies I like because he doesnt know what hes talking about so Im umlikely to take offense. Whereas if I attack his taste in movies, because Ive seen the films he likes and am coming from a more informed perspective, my comments are more likely to be upsetting, because they are more likely to be true!! Well tough the truth hurts. Location: Lawrenceville, GA Whoa, I thought this was a suggestion thread, not a debate. Anyway, I want to reiterate my point. Dancer is an overall good film, depending on your taste. Personally, my only problem with it is is that it seems uneven. It seemed like a drama but really is more of an experiment in genre and dogme95 technique. Ater watching the DVD supplementsI did buy the film myself, so I do think of it as a worthwhile watch, I think this is how von Trier feels about the film himself. Ill admit there is more compassion in this film compare to most modern fare, but it is overshadowed by the experimental nature of the film. To some who may not be observing the film more closely, this may look like von Trier is mocking satanic symbols drama in the film, which I dont fell he set out to do. So Redux, if youre still on the fence about getting the film, I think you should really think about type of things you look for in watching a film. If youre about experimentation, then I think you will enjoy Dancer. If youre not into experimental filmmaking, or are more interested in the drama of the situation, then this may be an uncomfortable watch. It will be smart of you to rent first. Why is it that every time Maha gets into a thread, it becomes a Maha VS everyone debate. MV Your general comments about the trash that mainstream Hollywood puts out and your campaigning for art film give everyone a good idea of what your taste is.