Final draft 8 Now if you are

Final draft 8

Now if you are capped at your it wont take very long 256kb, then it will take nearer 13 In the UK, the average speed is about 4mb. Now imagine everyone downloading films online as that is the only way to obtain them, it just wouldnt work in the current state. Despite the media hype, a small percentage of connected internet users use P2P to download films illegaly, and even with that small proportion, ISPs are unable to cope with the amount of bandwdth required of them, hence the capping. The small number of people using the BBC iPlayer is enough to cause concern to UK ISPs with regards to bandwidth issues. Bringing me back final draft 8 again to that fact that the entire infrastructure of the internet needs an overhaul if its is to be able to sustain the selling of digital media. Also what are you arguing about when it comes to the legal or not legal issue? What difference does that make to the argument that optical media will remain here for the foreseeable? And lastly, what are you on about when it comes to it was merely an example of how physical media is still in demand. Businesses work on a meet the demand model. well i dont know about you, but i see 13 hours as a pretty quick download time. it will only be an overnight download, nothing wrong about that from where i see it anyways. ok i have ADLS2, its the fastest we can get around here unless we move to the city, it is blisteringly fast. even when i upped to 8mbits p/s that was fast. i know that id be willing to wait a little while for a movie, as opposed to driving around looking for the movie in HD DVD nono these days or waiting a week for it to torrent! you think your ISPs need an overall?? man please come to australia and check it out, our system is terrible. if you have solid numbers about the slowing of the ISPs and whatnot, come and share please. id love to know the actual final draft 8 P2P and all the other types of final draft 8 have on everything. there are two main points i am making with that statement. a people are downloading more, thus keeping things on their hard drives more, thus using less DVDs and optical media this is also people of the whole computer home theatre systems. connecting your macmini into a HD screen and using that as your media server. i am doing this in a coupla months, just gotta get the mini:. b legal or illegal, people are downloading a hell of a lot more than they used to, optical media especially in the movie sector has taken a pretty nasty hit. just look at the iTunes stores numbers, they have many titles available for you to download yada yada yada and they are pretty darn cheap. so yea. it all counts. i am COMPLETELY confused as to why people want to use old technology. its wayyy outdated, it sounds pathetic, and its overall just crap. who are you going to see carrying around a record player and a few records. i just completely miss the point of using outdated technology except for when it cant be afforded of course. What does it mean to add Blu-ray support? Applications already support it in Leopard, Roxio Toast, a new app ArchiveMac, and even base Leopard disk utility. LG makes an excellent Blu-ray burner that Newegg is selling for It can also read HD-DVD if anyone cares anymore. Not only that but more apps will run on the mac witch may draw more people to the mac. Also, macs run windows right? How about a MBP running the latest verson of OSX and Vista ultimate SP tblu-ray etc. that right there at least in my opinion, is one sweet system. the only one youll ever need since you have the best of both worlds. On the whole Blu-ray thing, I agree that Apple is way behind on this. I hope that when they do finally release Macs with Blu-ray BTO options that they dont do it with much too much fanfare. That would make them look silly as they are already 2 or 3 years behind everyone else.