Agoraphobic singer uk If you

Agoraphobic singer uk

If you dont want to have the choice of a BTO blu-ray drive in the next MBP thats fine. I do want the choice as do many others. I have a large blu-ray collection, I live in an area with poor internet speeds. My nearest video rental store is 25 miles away. I have a 60 pioneer kuro plasma TV. I use a 8 core MacPro with dual 30 cinema displays for work and play. I have tried Apples HD itunes service and it stunk. I am not a fan of cloud computing in general because it means I have to rely on someone elses service to access my data. So far I have not been impressed with any of the offerings. Youre right, it doesnt mean Apple has to stick with slot-loading drive, but I pointed out incidents where Apple was willing to sacrifice functionality to maintain thinness and noted that they are obsessed with making their hardware thinner. What rationale do you have that a seldom used optical drive would warrant an excessive thickening of the Mac notebook chassis with a a clunky, un-seamless drive that is too expensive for most users, that takes up more space than any other component in the notebook, and holds very little information and is considerably slow compared to HDD and flash storage mediums? PS: Apple will be phasing be the optical drive out. On the consumer side, the technology is dying. Installing applications and OSes via optical disc is no longer the best method. People dont use their agoraphobic singer uk drives much as it is and using a Blu-ray reader on a note book to watch a movie with only the battery is foolish, at best. Either Apple will move the optical drive outside of portable Macs with the upcoming case revision or the one after that. That doesnt mean that Blu-ray still cant be supported or be an option when that happened, it just means it wont be an internal solution. Does Apple have to keep making things slimmer now that they have a slim option in the Macbook Air? If you want slim, and dont care about Blu-Ray buy the MacBook Air? Maybe they will even put out a netbook type laptop too? Maybe they will choose a slightly thicker and bigger laptop form in order to put Blu-Ray in, and perhaps a bigger battery. Regardless if you want to play Blu-Ray movies or not, few people would not benefit from longer runtime. All of this would be possible with a case redesign widely rumored and a move to 16×9 screens hopefully with 1080p resolution. I think that Steve Jobs sits on the Board of Disney and probably owns more stock than Walts kids. Disney is sold out to Blu-Ray, every studio is sold out to Blu-Ray, every other laptop manufacturer has Blu-Ray options and some are dang cheap. Apples core markets include Video professionals, and in 2005 Steve declared it the year of HD! Its only 3 years late Steve. My Biggest fear, as stated here by others is will they do it in October or wait for the big Macworld announcement? Because I think the announcement for Blu-Ray would have to be a sweeping announcement of all new hardware across the entire Mac lineup and cinema Displays. With everything moving to 16X9 screens and getting Blu-ray support. I have literally had thousands of dollars in the bank waiting for the Blu-Ray announcement. They dont get my dollars until they announce it. I only get a new laptop every five years, so it has to count when I pull the trigger. If Mac Pros are outfitted with 45nm CPUs then there is a short term transition to agoraphobic singer uk versions. This is where Apple has a decision to make on either offering two Mac Pro refreshes within 6 months, create a middle tier box to be one revision behind 45nm while the Mac Pro gets agoraphobic singer uk 32nm-highly unlikely, or will they stretch out the current boxes and add BTO options for BluRay, more GPUs and such until the 32 nm chips are ready to, according to sources and roadmaps, isnt due until end 2009early 20 So it looks like we may see new Mac Pros at the start of every year.